Adam, The First Man, Really?
by Owen Borville
August 19, 2019
Bible
Adam was the first man on Earth.....Really?
Yes.
Mainstream evolutionist scientists insist that man has been on earth for thousands of years before the date of the first appearance of Adam, some 6,000 years ago.
Scientists claim that humanity could not come from a single man created out of nothing.
However, this creation out of nothing is exactly the belief of the creation science movement and most of the Biblical Christian world.
Actually, Adam was created out of the dust of the Earth plus the Spirit of God, according to Genesis 1 of the Bible and he was created not as a baby but as a fully grown man.
Evolutionist scientists claim that there were men living on Earth thousands of years before Adam, up to 100,000 years ago and that these men "evolved" from a common ancestor.
Some evolutionists believe the human history on Earth dates back into the millions of years because of their belief that humans had a common ancestor with other animals and that the date of these evolving animals "becoming human" is ambiguous.
Evolutionists will use several faulty evidences, such as the fossil record and radiocarbon dating methods to support their belief.
Yes, these evolutionists will do everything to convince the public that the Bible is incorrect in order to cause Christians to question the accuracy of the Bible as God's Word.
However, creationists have shown strong evidence that Adam was the first man, or that all humanity originated from one single human couple that were created out of nothing...nothing except dust and God's spirit.
Agriculture Activities Are Too Recent to Support Old Timeline for Man
Scientists and archaeologists have had trouble finding evidence for agriculture activities older than 5,000 years ago (or 10,000 years ago according to their time scale).
If man has existed on Earth for at least 100,000 years, it would not take that long for humans to figure out how seeds grow crops or how to domesticate animals.
If humans had to hunt for animals all of the time for food, there simply would not be enough food to go around and human population growth would be impossible.
And if humans had not discovered crop agriculture until a few thousand years ago, then the only human food source would be animals plus wild plants.
It is difficult to see how the human population could survive for so long and grow without crop agriculture and animal domestication.
Surely within a reasonable amount of time humans would realize that domesticating animals was much easier to provide food for the population than hunting.
The Bible describes Adam and his family farming, both with crop agriculture and animal domestication sometime during their lifetime, therefore it did not take 100,000 years to learn agricultural methods.
The Lack of Written Documents Before 5,000 Years Ago Supports Young Timeline for Man
There are also a lack of human written records from before 5,000 years ago, which would account for the Genesis global flood wiping human evidence out for previous times since creation.
Evolutionists claim radiocarbon dating proves human artifacts up to 50,000 years old and older but creationists believe that these dates are inaccurate.
Specifically, creationists believe that the events of the Genesis Flood approximately 4,000-4,500 years ago not only wiped out all human artifacts, but this event radically altered radiation levels on Earth, and therefore human artifacts before the Flood would show dates up to 50,000 years old or older instead of their true age within 5,000-6,000 years.
The amount of Carbon-14 production in the atmosphere has varied significantly during the history of the Earth and therefore radiocarbon dating ages can vary significantly, while contamination from the environment can also produce faulty ages from radiocarbon dating.
Evolutionists deny the occurrence of the global flood and insist that rock strata were deposited over millions of years, which creationists deny and explain that the rock strata on Earth were deposited by the global Genesis Flood.
Lack of Human Grave Sites Found Support Young Timeline for Man
If humans have been living on Earth for at least 100,000 years, there simply would be more grave sites, more human skeleton corpses, and more human tomb structures.
The lack of these human artifacts on Earth gives strong evidence of human habitation on earth in the 5,000-6,000 year range and not 100,000 years or more.
by Owen Borville
August 19, 2019
Bible
Adam was the first man on Earth.....Really?
Yes.
Mainstream evolutionist scientists insist that man has been on earth for thousands of years before the date of the first appearance of Adam, some 6,000 years ago.
Scientists claim that humanity could not come from a single man created out of nothing.
However, this creation out of nothing is exactly the belief of the creation science movement and most of the Biblical Christian world.
Actually, Adam was created out of the dust of the Earth plus the Spirit of God, according to Genesis 1 of the Bible and he was created not as a baby but as a fully grown man.
Evolutionist scientists claim that there were men living on Earth thousands of years before Adam, up to 100,000 years ago and that these men "evolved" from a common ancestor.
Some evolutionists believe the human history on Earth dates back into the millions of years because of their belief that humans had a common ancestor with other animals and that the date of these evolving animals "becoming human" is ambiguous.
Evolutionists will use several faulty evidences, such as the fossil record and radiocarbon dating methods to support their belief.
Yes, these evolutionists will do everything to convince the public that the Bible is incorrect in order to cause Christians to question the accuracy of the Bible as God's Word.
However, creationists have shown strong evidence that Adam was the first man, or that all humanity originated from one single human couple that were created out of nothing...nothing except dust and God's spirit.
Agriculture Activities Are Too Recent to Support Old Timeline for Man
Scientists and archaeologists have had trouble finding evidence for agriculture activities older than 5,000 years ago (or 10,000 years ago according to their time scale).
If man has existed on Earth for at least 100,000 years, it would not take that long for humans to figure out how seeds grow crops or how to domesticate animals.
If humans had to hunt for animals all of the time for food, there simply would not be enough food to go around and human population growth would be impossible.
And if humans had not discovered crop agriculture until a few thousand years ago, then the only human food source would be animals plus wild plants.
It is difficult to see how the human population could survive for so long and grow without crop agriculture and animal domestication.
Surely within a reasonable amount of time humans would realize that domesticating animals was much easier to provide food for the population than hunting.
The Bible describes Adam and his family farming, both with crop agriculture and animal domestication sometime during their lifetime, therefore it did not take 100,000 years to learn agricultural methods.
The Lack of Written Documents Before 5,000 Years Ago Supports Young Timeline for Man
There are also a lack of human written records from before 5,000 years ago, which would account for the Genesis global flood wiping human evidence out for previous times since creation.
Evolutionists claim radiocarbon dating proves human artifacts up to 50,000 years old and older but creationists believe that these dates are inaccurate.
Specifically, creationists believe that the events of the Genesis Flood approximately 4,000-4,500 years ago not only wiped out all human artifacts, but this event radically altered radiation levels on Earth, and therefore human artifacts before the Flood would show dates up to 50,000 years old or older instead of their true age within 5,000-6,000 years.
The amount of Carbon-14 production in the atmosphere has varied significantly during the history of the Earth and therefore radiocarbon dating ages can vary significantly, while contamination from the environment can also produce faulty ages from radiocarbon dating.
Evolutionists deny the occurrence of the global flood and insist that rock strata were deposited over millions of years, which creationists deny and explain that the rock strata on Earth were deposited by the global Genesis Flood.
Lack of Human Grave Sites Found Support Young Timeline for Man
If humans have been living on Earth for at least 100,000 years, there simply would be more grave sites, more human skeleton corpses, and more human tomb structures.
The lack of these human artifacts on Earth gives strong evidence of human habitation on earth in the 5,000-6,000 year range and not 100,000 years or more.
