Evolution and Origins Science
by Owen Borville
November 4, 2018
Science
Origins science is distinguished from operational science. Operational science is concerned mainly with how things operate today and is not concerned with the origin of those things. Fields such as engineering and applied sciences deal mainly with operational science while the basic traditional sciences such as biology, biochemistry, geology, physics, and astronomy deal with origins and are at the center of the debate. Basically, things that can be tested in a laboratory are part of operational science: the composition of a rock or mineral, the composition of a liquid substance, the anatomy of a pea plant, the description of how a machine engine operates, and the description of how a computer operates are part of operational science.
Origins science involves processes that cannot be observed in a laboratory, such as the origin of the universe, the origin of the earth, and the origin of life on earth. Origins science is based on theories developed by scientists that cannot be observed in a laboratory and therefore is open to assumptions that are difficult to be verified. The question of the origin of the universe, the earth, and life on earth is just as much a question of religion as it is a question of science. The mainstream science and academia prefers to exclude religion from their work, however it is unfair to say that the origin of the universe is not a religious question. Therefore, mainstream science attempts to use purely naturalistic explanations for all processes observed on earth and the universe, including their origin.
Evolutionists claim that they have contributed greatly to science but have only contributed in promoting their worldview. Evolutionists and their doctrine of uniform processes over millions of years have not explained any process in operational science or how any process in science works. Evolution cannot be tested in a laboratory, therefore it is not operational science. Evolutionists only contribute their false interpretations of geologic and biological processes that cannot be verified in a laboratory but can only be described as theories of origin that grossly contradict scientific evidence.
Creationists have confirmed their belief in the young earth and special creation with verifiable scientific evidence. Many natural processes long thought to take millions of years by evolutionists have been confirmed by creationists to occur quickly within weeks or months in the laboratory. Organic deposits such as coal and oil thought to have formed over millions of years while buried under layers of sediment have been confirmed by laboratory experiments to occur with in weeks or months when certain conditions are applied. The evolutionists reject this evidence and continue to promote their long gradual processes over millions of years.
by Owen Borville
November 4, 2018
Science
Origins science is distinguished from operational science. Operational science is concerned mainly with how things operate today and is not concerned with the origin of those things. Fields such as engineering and applied sciences deal mainly with operational science while the basic traditional sciences such as biology, biochemistry, geology, physics, and astronomy deal with origins and are at the center of the debate. Basically, things that can be tested in a laboratory are part of operational science: the composition of a rock or mineral, the composition of a liquid substance, the anatomy of a pea plant, the description of how a machine engine operates, and the description of how a computer operates are part of operational science.
Origins science involves processes that cannot be observed in a laboratory, such as the origin of the universe, the origin of the earth, and the origin of life on earth. Origins science is based on theories developed by scientists that cannot be observed in a laboratory and therefore is open to assumptions that are difficult to be verified. The question of the origin of the universe, the earth, and life on earth is just as much a question of religion as it is a question of science. The mainstream science and academia prefers to exclude religion from their work, however it is unfair to say that the origin of the universe is not a religious question. Therefore, mainstream science attempts to use purely naturalistic explanations for all processes observed on earth and the universe, including their origin.
Evolutionists claim that they have contributed greatly to science but have only contributed in promoting their worldview. Evolutionists and their doctrine of uniform processes over millions of years have not explained any process in operational science or how any process in science works. Evolution cannot be tested in a laboratory, therefore it is not operational science. Evolutionists only contribute their false interpretations of geologic and biological processes that cannot be verified in a laboratory but can only be described as theories of origin that grossly contradict scientific evidence.
Creationists have confirmed their belief in the young earth and special creation with verifiable scientific evidence. Many natural processes long thought to take millions of years by evolutionists have been confirmed by creationists to occur quickly within weeks or months in the laboratory. Organic deposits such as coal and oil thought to have formed over millions of years while buried under layers of sediment have been confirmed by laboratory experiments to occur with in weeks or months when certain conditions are applied. The evolutionists reject this evidence and continue to promote their long gradual processes over millions of years.
