Grand Theories of Everything and Free Speech
by Owen Borville
November 29, 2018
Science
Mainstream science is known for promoting "Grand Theories of Everything" to explain topics related to the origin of the universe, the earth, and life on earth. Science promotes the Big Bang Theory to explain the origin of the universe despite the fact there are major problems with this theory and not everyone accept this theory, including even some evolutionists. Biological macroevolution is used to describe the origin and appearance of life on earth, despite many objections to the key principles of this theory which cannot be observed in a laboratory.
Therefore, new ideas are rarely introduced and prevailing theories of origins of the universe and life remain despite serious problems with these theories. The problem with "theories of everything" is that observations do not always fit the model and therefore these theories cannot explain everything that is observed. Mainstream scientists commonly ignore these problems or observations that do not fit the model and continue to promote the grand theories of everything. The result is that we have a false picture of our origins of life and the origin of the universe.
Free speech should be welcomed and preserved and new ideas should be considered in science in order to encourage those scientists who have new ideas to present them and thereby make new contributions to the fields of science.
by Owen Borville
November 29, 2018
Science
Mainstream science is known for promoting "Grand Theories of Everything" to explain topics related to the origin of the universe, the earth, and life on earth. Science promotes the Big Bang Theory to explain the origin of the universe despite the fact there are major problems with this theory and not everyone accept this theory, including even some evolutionists. Biological macroevolution is used to describe the origin and appearance of life on earth, despite many objections to the key principles of this theory which cannot be observed in a laboratory.
Therefore, new ideas are rarely introduced and prevailing theories of origins of the universe and life remain despite serious problems with these theories. The problem with "theories of everything" is that observations do not always fit the model and therefore these theories cannot explain everything that is observed. Mainstream scientists commonly ignore these problems or observations that do not fit the model and continue to promote the grand theories of everything. The result is that we have a false picture of our origins of life and the origin of the universe.
Free speech should be welcomed and preserved and new ideas should be considered in science in order to encourage those scientists who have new ideas to present them and thereby make new contributions to the fields of science.
